Cotton’s bill, which was filed on Friday afternoon, is S. 3376 and it's been filed with the Senate Committee at the Judiciary, meaning it's eligible for debate and, if it'll occur, voting for its passage. The bill’s title is a bit of meandering but it surely firmly states it's “(A) bill to verify the integrity of laws enacted to forestall using financial instruments for funding or operating online casinos don't seem to be undermined by legal opinions not carrying the force of law issued by Federal Government lawyers.”
Deciphering the legalese, S. 3376 has potentially several different interpretations. One is that it will look to reverse the Christmas 2011 decision by the dep. of Justice that the Wire Act only applied to sports betting and no other online activities, reminiscent of casino gaming and poker. That decision, handed down in keeping with the states of Illinois and New York’s inquiries as to the legality of using the web for online lottery sales, opened the doors for intrastate online gaming operations that took place in Nevada, New Jersey and Delaware and people being considered in other states akin to California, Pennsylvania and New York.
Another potential interpretation might be in that it's trying to expand the Wire Act, reworking it in a fashion to make it more applicable to today’s fast-paced world. It might even be a bill in order to firmly prohibit using credit/debit cards for gambling transactions, whether or not they are legal (as in a Las Vegas casino) or illegal. Finally, it could put some enforcement action into the UIGEA, which was passed with out a punishments nor enforcement actions taken.
More at Poker News Daily
Similar Stories from This Week in Gambling:
Read More... [Source: Poker News and Features – This Week in Gambling]
No comments:
Post a Comment